Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 04:32
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Inside the Vault – Upcoming Combat and Perk Changes - Bethesda.net
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
When was the first time your wife had beastiality?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is it possible to permanently quit pornography?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
I’ve tracked Amazon Prime Day for 11 years. Here are the 8 best early TV deals - CNN
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Long-term study ties midlife vascular health to later dementia risk - Medical Xpress
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Travis Kelce Salutes Taylor Swift for Buying Her Masters Back, 'It's Finally Hers' - Bleacher Report
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Man eats dubious street food—ends up blowing apart his GI tract - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?